Submitted by ajuhasz on Dec 03, 2008, 02:53 PM

I am MP:me. I use my laptop?s tiny camera, imovie, and YouTube to make and network small, ?bad? videos as part of my femi-digi-praxis. In this attempt, I?m out seeking productive fake docs on YouTube. Care to help me?

In my book, F is for Phony: Fake Documentary and Truth?s Undoing (which I edited with Jesse Lerner) I define the fake documentary as ?fiction films that make use of (copy, mock, mimic, gimmick) documentary style and therefore acquire its associated content (the moral and social) and associated feelings (belief, trust, authenticity) to create a documentary experience defined by their antithesis, self-conscious distance.? Perhaps you?ve noticed, but such things litter, no really define, video on YouTube. Once the fake to a certainly dicey but notable real, on YouTube fake docs are the real to a decidedly disappeared belief, trust and authenticity. YouTube is dominated by mimicky gimmicks, glib repetitions, fake takes on the already untrue. So many media morsels gleefully winking at their near mirror image; so many video bloggers tipping their hats to their multiple fabricated selves. That?s the funny and fake vernacular of YouTube: this sincere attempt at academic discourse and communication withstanding. Hey: you try to be earnest, genuine, yourself, in this sea of irony. Believe me, no one will trust its really you?

Now, the productive fake doc is another story. In the book we included 15 chapters on the sub-genre. But look as I may, I can?t find ?em on YouTube. I defined productive fake docs ?as those that self-consciously and directly engage with history, identity and truth in a political and formal project that links and unlinks power to the act of recording the visible world and to the documentary record produced.? This is where you come in.

I?ve been invited to give some talks in early 2009 about shifting media boundaries?fake/real, documentary/art?and I know that this must be happening on YouTube. Everything does. But why go it alone?solo pundit braving it in the video wilds?when what I study is famously based upon the new structures of collective intelligence, the wisdom of crowds, and the out-sourcing of labor in the name of fun.

Will you send me your favorite productive fake doc and participate in the play (here, on YouTube or Facebook)? Share with me a link and make sure to add a comment if you want to convince me. And I?ll need it by early January to make the cut. If I like what I see and also what you say, I?ll include you in my glamorous upcoming talks in Iowa or at CAA. I promise.

Oh. Also: Could you pass this on? Network it? Can I trust you? Use you? I don?t know where this project will end. But you can certainly follow me on-line as I attempt my productive fake quest through our contemporary video m

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Old Negro
Posted on Dec 03, 2008-11:47pm by ajuhasz
ajuhasz
Offline
My colleague, and fellow-editor, Jesse lerner also turned me on to this video. I'm wondering how productively this, or any other stand-alone critique, works when floating (and competing) in the undifferentiated sea of YouTube.
Wicked Funny
Posted on Dec 04, 2008-07:08am by Cathy Davidson
I hadn't seen the Old Negro Space Program . . . the banjo music, the fiddle music, the hilarious voice over, like the best parody really rips open the hypocrisy and sentimentalism of what it parodies while being very, very funny and well done.
Very little
Posted on Dec 04, 2008-05:04pm by Steve Burnett
Very little interest-generating purpose: youtube was a primary communication tool and content distribution method in the shared-fiction future prediction that was Superstruct.
a Ben Burrns documentary
Posted on Dec 04, 2008-08:16pm by Julie
Julie
Offline
no hidden gems here, but I assume you've seen the History of LOLcats? it's a G4 network project, but clearly perfect for YouTube meme-osphere. I think it fits the first part of your definition in its sendup of the hypernationalist Ken Burns formula, although given its adoption of civil rights discourse its politics is perhaps dubious. I'm not so certain it "links and unlinks power to the act of recording the visible world and to the documentary record produced" -- although perhaps I myself am understanding "recording the visible world" too strictly in terms of the real.
The documentary-format film
Posted on Dec 03, 2008-07:52pm by Steve Burnett
The documentary-format film Wax: Or The Discovery of Television Among The Bees (wikipedia), is one of my favorites of the genre. Currently, much of the Superstruct cooperative game predicting the future was conducted using Youtube, and might be relevant to your current interests.
Mock-umentary
Posted on Dec 03, 2008-10:20pm by jhenry
jhenry
Offline

As far as "gimmick, mock" you have to check out "The Old Negro Space Program". I think this fits in pretty well with what you're looking for, the footage in some cases is actually ripped from some Ken Burns stuff, also, it's really funny.

superstruct
Posted on Dec 03, 2008-11:46pm by ajuhasz
ajuhasz
Offline
Thanks for this recc. It's good. How was YouTube used, may I ask, other than generating interest?
LOL
Posted on Dec 08, 2008-12:08pm by ajuhasz
ajuhasz
Offline
That is a great fake and funny doc, so thanks, but not productive, as you also suggest. However, it effectively raises for me one of my central concerns in this project, namely: how are the register, affect, or meanings created by the fake doc approach different from those produced by "real" LOLcats. I am currently considering that the distancing, ironic, self-referential voice of fake docs IS the voice of YouTube. Any thoughts? Alex